https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2015/03/going-clear-disturbing-moments?srsltid=AfmBOooXqCG2z_MFmRQZ5PWAMNXo--X6F5UOp
ZzacJl-9LdYbPN5VZEo
Showing posts with label DonnieHaroldHarris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DonnieHaroldHarris. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 26, 2025
Monday, August 4, 2025
WHAT IS THE WORST known or unknown threat to the world?
An "unknown threat" implies something that is either unknown or whose potential impact hasn't been fully understood. Discussions about these threats often focus on high-uncertainty risks that could have catastrophic consequences.
Potential "worst unknown threats to the world" include:
Unforeseen anthropogenic risks
- These risks stem from human activities, particularly in rapidly developing technologies, but whose full potential for harm isn't yet understood.
- Examples include the unintended consequences of technologies such as advanced artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, and nanotechnology.
- There is concern about the potential for self-replicating nanobots creating a "grey goo" scenario, where they consume the environment without control.
Low-probability, high-impact events
- These are events with a very low chance of occurring, but that could have devastating consequences.
- Examples include asteroid or comet impacts, supervolcanic eruptions, or a nearby stellar explosion.
- While the probability of these events is low, their potential for global disruption or even extinction makes them a concern.
Unknown unknowns
- This concept highlights the possibility of risks that are unknown or cannot be currently conceived.
- These are difficult to define but could arise from complex interactions between existing systems or from completely novel phenomena.
- The COVID-19 pandemic is an example of an emerging risk that highlights the challenges of preparing for unexpected events.
Risks exacerbated by other factors
- Existing risks, such as climate change, ecological degradation, or geopolitical tensions, can be amplified by unknown or emerging factors.
- For example, climate change could lead to massive migrations, resulting in unforeseen social and political instability.
- The spread of misinformation and disinformation can exacerbate existing social divisions and erode trust in institutions, making it more challenging to address shared crises.
The "worst unknown threat" remains unquantifiable. However, recognizing the possibility of such threats and fostering a proactive approach to risk management, scientific research, and global cooperation can help mitigate their potential impact. WHAT IS the worst unknown threat to the world? WHAT IS the worst unknown danger to the world?
An "unknown threat" implies something that is either unknown or whose potential impact hasn't been fully understood. Discussions about these threats often focus on high-uncertainty risks that could have catastrophic consequences.
Potential "worst unknown threats to the world" include:
Unforeseen anthropogenic risks
- These risks stem from human activities, particularly in rapidly developing technologies, but whose full potential for harm isn't yet understood.
- Examples include the unintended consequences of technologies such as advanced artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, and nanotechnology.
- There is concern about the potential for self-replicating nanobots creating a "grey goo" scenario, where they consume the environment without control.
Low-probability, high-impact events
- These are events with a very low chance of occurring, but that could have devastating consequences.
- Examples include asteroid or comet impacts, supervolcanic eruptions, or a nearby stellar explosion.
- While the probability of these events is low, their potential for global disruption or even extinction makes them a concern.
Unknown unknowns
- This concept highlights the possibility of risks that are unknown or cannot currently be conceived of.
- These are difficult to define but could arise from complex interactions between existing systems or from completely novel phenomena.
- The COVID-19 pandemic is an example of an emerging risk that highlights the challenges of preparing for unexpected events.
Risks exacerbated by other factors
- Existing risks, such as climate change, ecological degradation, or geopolitical tensions, can be amplified by unknown or emerging factors.
- For example, climate change could lead to massive migrations, resulting in unforeseen social and political instability.
- The spread of misinformation and disinformation can exacerbate existing social divisions and erode trust in institutions, making it more challenging to address shared crises.
The "worst unknown threat" remains unquantifiable. However, recognizing the possibility of such threats and fostering a proactive approach to risk management, scientific research, and global cooperation can help mitigate their potential impact.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PW4eD04QxV8?feature=share
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PW4eD04QxV8?feature=share
James Vincent Forrestal (February 15, 1892 – May 22, 1949)
James Vincent Forrestal (February 15, 1892 – May 22, 1949) was the last cabinet-level United States Secretary of the Navy and the first United States Secretary of Defense.[1]
Forrestal came from a rigorous middle-class Irish Catholic family. He was a successful financier on Wall Street before becoming Under Secretary of the Navy in 1940, shortly before the United States entered World War II. He became Secretary of the Navy in May 1944 upon the death of his superior, Col. Frank Knox. President Franklin D. Roosevelt requested that Forrestal take the lead in building up the Navy. In 1947, after the end of the war, President Harry S. Truman appointed him the first secretary of the newly created Department of Defense. Forrestal was intensely hostile to the Soviet Union, fearing Communist expansion in Europe and the Middle East. Along with Secretary of State George C. Marshall, he strongly opposed the United States' support for the establishment of the State of Israel, fearing that this would alienate Arab nations, which were needed as allies, and whose petroleum reserves were vital for both military and civilian industrial expansion.
Forrestal was a supporter of naval battle groups centered on aircraft carriers. He tried to weaken the proposed Department of Defense for the Navy's benefit, but was hard-pressed to run it from 1947 to 1949 after Truman named him Secretary of Defense. The two men were often at odds, and Truman forced Forrestal's resignation.
Thereafter, Forrestal's mental health rapidly deteriorated, declining to the point at which he underwent medical care for depression. While a patient at Bethesda Naval Hospital, Forrestal died by an alleged suicide from fatal injuries sustained after falling out of a sixteenth-floor window.
In 1954, the USN's new supercarrier was named USS Forrestal in his honor, as is the James V. Forrestal Building, which houses the headquarters of the United States Department of Energy. He is the namesake of the Forrestal Lecture Series at the United States Naval Academy and of the James Forrestal Campus of his alma mater, Princeton University. Information regarding a person's suicide can vary widely based on the circumstances surrounding their death. Often, details may include the individual's mental health history, personal struggles, or events leading up to the incident. If you are referring to a specific individual, please provide their name for a more focused response. It's essential to approach this topic with sensitivity and to consider the impact of discussing such events on those affected.
James Vincent Forrestal
James Vincent Forrestal, the first U.S. Secretary of Defense, died by suicide on May 22, 1949, at the age of 48. He fell from the 16th floor of the Bethesda Naval Hospital in Maryland, where he was hospitalized for depression and other mental health issues. Forrestal had been under significant stress due to the pressures of his position during the early Cold War and had reportedly struggled with bouts of severe anxiety and paranoia. His death raised concerns about the mental health of high-ranking officials and prompted discussions about the support systems available for those in such positions.
Friday, August 1, 2025
First there is four Then there were three. Then two to one. Krishna, Buddha, Jesus, Mohamad.
Krishna, Buddha, Jesus, and Mohamad. First there were four. Then there were three. Then two to one. Science came out of Religion. Threw the placebo hole. Will Science die if we resolve the four horsemen protocol? Will Religion become one superpower of belief? Will all things disappear that are thought forms? Will men and women bond as one? And race and nationality become hearsay? Will location mean the planet? Will we evolve upward instead of dividing into subatomic structures of belief, doingness, and havingness? Will a home become a castle or a house for the family? Will wealth become an everyday necessity for all? Common, direct, and as needed, not desired? Will we become all? Is God top dog?
Thursday, July 31, 2025
Was Timothy Leary in prison with Charlie Manson?
Yes, Timothy Leary and Charles Manson were housed in adjacent cells in solitary confinement at
Folsom State Prison
In California during a period of Leary's incarceration in the 1970s. Although they couldn't see each other, they reportedly spoke frequently through their cell walls. The conversations reportedly included discussions about their philosophies and interpretations of events from the 1960s. Manson allegedly expressed surprise that Leary gave people LSD without attempting to control them. According to one account, Manson told Leary, "They took you off the streets so that I could continue with your work". On May 19, 1969, the Supreme Court in Leary v. United States declared the Marijuana Tax Act unconstitutional and overturned his 1965 conviction. (Unclear if Leary was in jail for 4 years or had been released on an appeal bond.)
After declaring his candidacy for governor of California in 1970, Leary was arrested on marijuana possession charges and received a decade-long jail sentence. He broke free from prison with outside help several months later and traveled abroad before being recaptured in Afghanistan in 1973. He was re-imprisoned and was ultimately released by state governmental decree in 1976. — Timothy Leary
MK Ultra
AI Mode
MKUltra: the CIA's clandestine mind control program
MKUltra was a top-secret and illegal human experimentation program developed and undertaken by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) during the Cold War. The program's goal was to investigate the potential use of psychedelic drugs, like LSD, and other techniques for mind control, information gathering, and psychological torture.
Origins and operations
MKUltra began in 1953, driven by fears of Soviet and Chinese mind-control techniques used on U.S. prisoners during the Korean War. The CIA aimed to develop similar methods against enemies and potentially manipulate foreign leaders. Experiments involved various techniques, including drugs like LSD, hypnosis, electroshock therapy, and sensory deprivation. These experiments often occurred without the subjects' consent, violating ethical standards. Subjects included unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens, such as prisoners, mental patients, military personnel, and even CIA agents. Specific examples of MKUltra activities included:
- CIA chemist Sidney Gottlieb was overseeing LSD administration to study reactions and potential for mind control.
- Operation Midnight Climax was a subproject using brothels to drug unsuspecting men with LSD and observe them.
- Canadian psychiatrist Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron conducted experiments involving drug-induced comas and repetitive audio messages with CIA funding.
- Establishment of clandestine detention centers in various countries for torture and human experimentation.
Exposure and aftermath
MKUltra was exposed in 1975 through investigations by the Church Committee and the Rockefeller Commission. Investigative efforts were hindered by the destruction of most MKUltra files in 1973. The program's revelations raised significant ethical and legal concerns regarding informed consent and human rights. The Church Committee's findings led to the first Executive Order on Intelligence Activities in 1976, prohibiting drug experimentation on human subjects without informed consent, a prohibition later expanded to all human experimentation. While some victims, like the family of Frank Olson, received compensation, most have not.
The legacy of MKUltra continues to highlight the potential for abuse of power in national security pursuits and the importance of ethical considerations in human research.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
Operation Midnight Climax was a subproject of the CIA's infamous MKUltra program, which involved extensive and illegal human experiments designed to develop techniques for mind control and interrogation
. MKUltra utilized various methods, including the administration of drugs, psychological manipulation, and other controversial techniques, often on unwitting participants. Operation Midnight Climax specifically involved the use of safe houses in San Francisco and New York, where individuals were secretly drugged and observed. The program operated without informed consent and involved serious ethical and legal violations.
The broader MKUltra program and its subprojects, like Operation Midnight Climax, were eventually exposed through congressional investigations in the 1970s. These investigations revealed the CIA's illegal human experimentation and led to increased scrutiny and regulation of government research involving human subjects.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
Beyond LSD: a glimpse into the broader drug experiments of MKUltra
While LSD holds a prominent place in the history of Project MKUltra, the CIA's clandestine mind control program involved a wider range of substances in its unethical human experiments. The program explored various drugs with potential for manipulation, interrogation, and even assassination, according to History.com.
Hallucinogens
Beyond LSD, other hallucinogens were explored for their potential to alter perception and behavior.
- Mescaline: Used in experiments to study its effects on the mind and behavior, potentially drawing on prior research conducted in Nazi concentration camps.
- Psilocybin: Also known as""magic mushrooms"" this psychedelic was among the substances investigated for its mind-altering properties.
- Peyote: This hallucinogenic cactus was also employed in some experiments to explore its effects on the human psyche.
Sedatives and stimulants
MKUltra researchers also explored the use of sedatives and stimulants, sometimes in combination, to induce altered states and gather information.
- Barbiturates: Administered to induce sleep or a state of relaxation, sometimes followed by the administration of stimulants to create a disoriented state conducive to interrogation.
- Amphetamines: Used to stimulate the nervous system and potentially enhance the effects of other drugs, according to a declassified CIA document.
- Sodium Pentothal: A barbiturate known as a""truth serum"" it was used in interrogations to potentially elicit information from subjects.
Other explored substances
Beyond the categories of hallucinogens, sedatives, and stimulants, MKUltra experiments explored a diverse array of other drugs:
- Heroin and Morphine: Opioids are potentially used in attempts to induce amnesia or for their effects on the mind and body.
- Cocaine: Another stimulant, explored for its potential effects on behavior and for its use in creating cocktail combinations with other drugs.
- Scopolamine: A drug known to induce a trance-like state and memory impairment, explored for its potential in interrogation and amnesia induction.
- Alcohol and Marijuana: Commonly used psychoactive substances, also explored in the MKUltra experiments.
- Temazepam: A sedative used under the code name MK-SEARCH in some experiments.
- MDMA (Ecstasy): Among the drugs investigated for its potential effects on behavior.
- BZ (Quinuclidinyl Benzilate): A highly potent hallucinogen that was developed and tested by the Army as a potential mind control weapon in the later years of MKUltra.
It is important to remember that these experiments were conducted without the subjects' informed consent and often resulted in severe and lasting harm, highlighting the unethical and illegal nature of Project MKUltra.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)